Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 10 de 10
Filter
1.
Rev. bras. cir. cardiovasc ; 35(2): 141-144, 2020. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1101481

ABSTRACT

Abstract Objective: To test the German Aortic Valve (GAV) score at our university hospital in patients undergoing isolated aortic valve replacement (AVR). Methods: A total of 224 patients who underwent isolated conventional AVR between January 2015 and December 2018 were included. Patients with concomitant procedures and transcatheter aortic valve implantation were excluded. Patients' data were collected and analyzed retrospectively. Patients' risk scores were calculated according to criteria described by GAV score. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy (area under the ROC curve [AUC]) were also calculated. The calibration of the model was tested by the Hosmer-Lemeshow method. Results: The mortality rate was 8.04% (18 patients). The patients' mean age was 58.2±19.3 years and 25% of them were female (56 patients). Mean GAV score was 1.73±5.86 (min: 0.0; max: 3.53). The GAV score showed excellent discriminative capacity (AUC 0.925, 95% confidence interval 0.882-0.956; P<0.001). The cutoff "1.8" turned out to be the best discriminatory point with the best combination of sensitivity (88.9%) and specificity (75.7%) to predict operative death. Hosmer-Lemeshow method revealed a P-value of 0.687, confirming a good calibration of the model. Conclusion: The GAV score applies to our population with high predictive accuracy.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation , Aortic Valve , Aortic Valve Stenosis , Brazil , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome , Risk Assessment
2.
Rev. bras. cir. cardiovasc ; 34(4): 396-405, July-Aug. 2019. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1020497

ABSTRACT

Abstract Objective: To evaluate whether there is any difference on the results of patients treated with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the setting of ischemic heart failure (HF). Methods: Databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register [CENTRAL/CCTR], ClinicalTrials.gov, Scientific Electronic Library Online [SciELO], Literatura Latino-americana e do Caribe em Ciências da Saúde [LILACS], and Google Scholar) were searched for studies published until February 2019. Main outcomes of interest were mortality, myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization, and stroke. Results: The search yielded 5,775 studies for inclusion. Of these, 20 articles were analyzed, and their data were extracted. The total number of patients included was 54,173, and those underwent CABG (N=29,075) or PCI (N=25098). The hazard ratios (HRs) for mortality (HR 0.763; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.678-0.859; P<0.001), myocardial infarction (HR 0.481; 95% CI 0.365-0.633; P<0.001), and repeat revascularization (HR 0.321; 95% CI 0.241-0.428; P<0.001) were lower in the CABG group than in the PCI group. The HR for stroke showed no statistically significant difference between the groups (random effect model: HR 0.879; 95% CI 0.625-1.237; P=0.459). Conclusion: This meta-analysis found that CABG surgery remains the best option for patients with ischemic HF, without increase in the risk of stroke.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Aged , Coronary Artery Bypass/mortality , Myocardial Ischemia/surgery , Stroke/etiology , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/mortality , Heart Failure/surgery , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/mortality , Brazil/epidemiology , Review Literature as Topic , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Meta-Analysis as Topic , Coronary Artery Bypass/adverse effects , Epidemiologic Methods , Multicenter Studies as Topic , Treatment Outcome , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Myocardial Ischemia/mortality , Evidence-Based Medicine , Stroke/mortality , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/adverse effects
3.
Rev. bras. cir. cardiovasc ; 34(3): 361-365, Jun. 2019. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1013459

ABSTRACT

Abstract Prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM) after surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) is an issue that has been overlooked (not to say neglected). Cardiac surgeons must bear in mind that this is a real problem that we must tackle. The purpose of this paper is to be a wake-up call to the surgical community by giving a brief overview of what PPM is, its incidence and impact on the outcomes. We also discuss the increasing role played by imaging for predicting and assessing PPM after SAVR (with which surgeons must become more acquainted) and, finally, we present some options to avoid PPM after the surgical procedure.


Subject(s)
Humans , Prosthesis Failure/adverse effects , Heart Valve Prosthesis/adverse effects , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/adverse effects , Postoperative Complications/mortality , Postoperative Complications/diagnostic imaging , Severity of Illness Index , Risk Factors , Treatment Failure , Risk Assessment , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/mortality
4.
Rev. bras. cir. cardiovasc ; 34(3): 318-326, Jun. 2019. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1013462

ABSTRACT

Abstract Objectives: This study sought to evaluate the impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM) on the risk of early-term mortality after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Methods: Databases (Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online [MEDLINE], Excerpta Medica dataBASE [EMBASE], Cochrane Controlled Trials Register [CENTRAL/CCTR], ClinicalTrials.gov, Scientific Electronic Library Online [SciELO], Latin American and Caribbean Literature on Health Sciences [LILACS], and Google Scholar) were searched for studies published until February 2019. PPM after TAVI was defined as moderate if the indexed effective orifice area (iEOA) was between 0.85 cm2/m2 and 0.65 cm2/m2 and as severe if iEOA ≤ 0.65 cm2/m2. Results: The search yielded 1,092 studies for inclusion. Of these, 18 articles were analyzed, and their data extracted. The total number of patients included who underwent TAVI was 71,106. The incidence of PPM after TAVI was 36.3% (25,846 with PPM and 45,260 without PPM). One-year mortality was not increased in patients with any PPM (odds ratio [OR] 1.021, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.979-1.065, P=0.338) neither in those with moderate PPM (OR 0.980, 95% CI 0.933-1.029, P=0.423). Severe PPM was separately associated with high risk (OR 1.109, 95% CI 1.041-1.181, P=0.001). Conclusion: The presence of severe PPM after TAVI increased early-term mortality. Although moderate PPM seemed harmless, the findings of this study cannot not rule out the possibility of it being detrimental, since there are other registries that did not address this issue yet.


Subject(s)
Humans , Prosthesis Failure/adverse effects , Heart Valve Prosthesis/adverse effects , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/adverse effects , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/mortality , Severity of Illness Index , Risk Factors , Treatment Failure , Risk Assessment
5.
Rev. bras. cir. cardiovasc ; 34(2): 203-212, Mar.-Apr. 2019. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-990564

ABSTRACT

Abstract Objective: This study sought to evaluate the impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on the risk of perioperative and long-term mortality after mitral valve replacement. Methods: Databases were researched for studies published until December 2018. Main outcomes of interest were perioperative and 10-year mortality and echocardiographic parameters. Results: The research yielded 2,985 studies for inclusion. Of these, 16 articles were analyzed, and their data extracted. The total number of patients included was 10,239, who underwent mitral valve replacement. The incidence of prosthesis-patient mismatch after mitral valve replacement was 53.7% (5,499 with prosthesis-patient mismatch and 4,740 without prosthesis-patient mismatch). Perioperative (OR 1.519; 95%CI 1.194-1.931, P<0.001) and 10-year (OR 1.515; 95%CI 1.280-1.795, P<0.001) mortality was increased in patients with prosthesis-patient mismatch. Patients with prosthesis-patient mismatch after mitral valve replacement had higher systolic pulmonary artery pressure and transprosthethic gradient and lower indexed effective orifice area and left ventricle ejection fraction. Conclusion: Prosthesis-patient mismatch increases perioperative and long-term mortality. Prosthesis-patient mismatch is also associated with pulmonary hypertension and depressed left ventricle systolic function. The findings of this study support the implementation of surgical strategies to prevent prosthesis-patient mismatch in order to decrease mortality rates.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Prosthesis Failure , Heart Valve Prosthesis/adverse effects , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/mortality , Mitral Valve/surgery , Postoperative Complications/mortality , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome , Perioperative Period/mortality
6.
Rev. bras. cir. cardiovasc ; 34(1): 93-97, Jan.-Feb. 2019. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-985242

ABSTRACT

Abstract The best treatment for patients with ischemic heart failure (HF) is still on debate. There is growing evidence that coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) benefits these patients. The current recommendations for revascularization in this context are that CABG is reasonable when it comes to decreasing morbidity and mortality rates for patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction (ejection fraction <35%), and significant coronary artery disease (CAD) and should be considered in patients with operable coronary anatomy, regardless whether or not there is a viable myocardium (class IIb). Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) does not have enough data to allow the panels to reach a conclusion. The Korean Acute Heart Failure registry (KorAHF) had its data released recently, showing that patients with acute HF who underwent CABG had lower death rates, more complete revascularization and less adverse outcomes compared with patients treated with PCI. Recent ESC/EACTS guidelines on myocardial revascularization clearly recommended CABG as the first choice of revascularization strategy in patients with multivessel disease and acceptable surgical risk to improve prognosis in this scenario of left ventricular dysfunction. However, a high peri-procedural risk must be compared with the benefit of late mortality, and pros and cons of each strategy (either PCI or CABG) must be weighed in the decision-making process. Spurred on by the publication of the above-mentioned article and the release of new guidelines, we went on to write an overview of the current practice of state-of-the-art coronary revascularization options in patients with HF.


Subject(s)
Humans , Coronary Artery Bypass/standards , Myocardial Ischemia/surgery , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/standards , Heart Failure/surgery , Coronary Artery Bypass/methods , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left/surgery , Risk Assessment , Evidence-Based Medicine , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/methods
7.
Rev. bras. cir. cardiovasc ; 33(5): 511-521, Sept.-Oct. 2018. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-977455

ABSTRACT

Abstract Objective: We aimed to analyze whether patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure reduces the risk of stroke, assessing also some safety outcomes after the publication of a new trial. Introduction: The clinical benefit of closing a PFO has been an open question, so it is necessary to review the current state of published medical data in regards to this subject. Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL/CCTR, SciELO, LILACS, Google Scholar and reference lists of relevant articles were used to search for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that reported any of the following outcomes: stroke, death, major bleeding or atrial fibrillation. Six studies fulfilled our eligibility criteria and included 3560 patients (1889 for PFO closure and 1671 for medical therapy. Results: The risk ration (RR) for stroke in the "closure" group compared with the "medical therapy" showed a statistically significant difference between the groups, favouring the "closure" group (RR 0.366; 95%CI 0.171-0.782, P=0.010). There was no statistically significant difference between the groups regarding the safety outcomes, death and major bleeding, but we observed an increase in the risk of atrial fibrillation in the "closure" group (RR 4.131; 95%CI 2.293-7.443, P<0.001). We also observed that the larger the proportion of effective closure, the lower the risk of stroke. Conclusion: This meta-analysis found that stroke rates are lower with percutaneously implanted device closure than with medical therapy alone, being these rates modulated by the rates of hypertension, atrial septal aneurysm and effective closure. The publication of a new trial did not change the scenario in the medical literature.


Subject(s)
Humans , Stroke/prevention & control , Foramen Ovale, Patent/surgery , Clinical Trials as Topic , Risk Assessment , Stroke/etiology , Foramen Ovale, Patent/complications
8.
Rev. bras. cir. cardiovasc ; 21(2): 194-197, abr.-jun. 2006. ilus, tab
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: lil-447719

ABSTRACT

OBJETIVO: Utilização de nova tecnologia na desmineralização química da valva aórtica, em cirurgia cardíaca com circulação extracorpórea, avaliação de suas alterações hemodinâmicas e reportar eventos relacionados à técnica. MÉTODO: Cinco pacientes, submetidos à revascularização miocárdica e portadores de estenose aórtica leve a moderada, receberam tratamento químico na valva aórtica. A idade dos pacientes variou de 65 a 81 anos, com média de 73 anos; sendo todos do sexo masculino. Um paciente tinha doença uniarterial e quatro, multiarterial (quatro vasos). O gradiente médio variou de 13 a 49 mmHg, com média de 25 mmHg. A área média do orifício aórtico variou de 0,8 a 1,3 cm², com média de 1,1cm². Os antecedentes observados foram: hipertensão arterial, hipercolesterolemia, diabete melito e fumo. RESULTADOS: O período de pinçamento aórtico variou de 94 a 126 minutos, com média de 107 minutos. O tempo de "bypass" variou de 134 a 171 minutos, com média de 152 minutos. O tempo de tratamento variou de 13 a 33 minutos, com média de 28 minutos. Não foi observado nenhum óbito. Complicações pós-operatórias observadas foram: bloqueio atrioventricular total em três pacientes. Não foram observados eventos que comprometessem a integridade da valva aórtica ou provocassem insuficiência aórtica pós-tratamento. Também não se observaram eventos neurológicos, sistêmicos, metabólicos ou hematológicos. O gradiente transvalvar pós-operatório, determinado pelo ecocardiograma, demonstrou melhora no gradiente sistólico e médio. CONCLUSÕES: O tratamento demonstrou ser efetivo e seguro, não causando lesão à valva ou algum evento sistêmico. As alterações do sistema de condução parecem relacionadas com o equipamento e seu sistema de liberação da substância de lavagem. A utilização desta tecnologia poderá ser, no futuro, um importante coadjuvante na substituição da valva aórtica por via transcutânea.


OBJECTIVE: To discuss the use of new technology in the chemical demineralization of the aortic valve in coronary artery bypass surgery, together with its hemodynamic changes and to report events related to the technique. METHOD: Five patients with mild to moderate aortic stenosis submitted to myocardial revascularization underwent chemical treatment of the aortic valve. The patients' ages ranged from 65 to 81 years, with a mean of 73 years. All were men. One patient had the involvement of a single artery and four multiple arteries (four vessels). The gradient ranged from 13 to 49 mmHg, with a mean of 25 mmHg. The size of the aortic orifice ranged from 0.8 to 1.3 cm², with a mean of 1.1 cm². The following antecedents were observed: arterial hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, diabetes mellitus and smoking. RESULTS: The aorta clamping time ranged from 94 to 126 minutes, with a mean of 107 minutes and the bypass time was from 134 to 171 minutes, with a mean of 152 minutes. The time of surgery was from 13 to 33 minutes with a mean of 28 minutes. No deaths were recorded. The only postoperative complication noted was a total AV block in three patients. No events were observed that might impair the integrity of the aortic valve or cause aortic insufficiency following treatment. Likewise, no neurologic, systemic, metabolic or hematologic events were seen. The postoperative transvalvular gradient identified by echocardiography showed an improvement in the systolic gradient and in the mean gradient. CONCLUSIONS: The treatment proved to be effective and safe, causing no lesions of the valve or any systemic event. The changes in the conduction system appear to be related to the equipment and its system of releasing the lavage solution. The use of this technology may, in the future, be an important adjuvant in aorta valve replacement using percutaneous techniques.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Adult , Middle Aged , Aortic Valve Stenosis , Aortic Valve/surgery , Calcinosis , Decalcification Technique , Demineralization
9.
Rev. bras. cir. cardiovasc ; 18(3): 261-267, July-Sept. 2003. ilus, tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-360611

ABSTRACT

OBJETIVO: Nos últimos anos, tem-se observado um grande avanço na cirurgia de revascularizaçäo miocárdica sem circulaçäo extracorpórea (RMSCEC). Esse desenvolvimento deveu-se à combinaçäo dos avanços da técnica cirúrgica e ao desenvolvimento de instrumentos que possibilitam a realizaçäo deste procedimento nas mais variadas situações. Este é um estudo retrospectivo, que visa avaliar nossa experiência com este procedimento nos últimos 11,5 anos. Os autores enfatizam o rápido progresso do método nos últimos anos, suas indicações, contra-indicações e resultados. MÉTODO: No período de agosto de 1991 e dezembro de 2002, 3.410 pacientes consecutivos, portadores de angina do peito, foram submetidos a cirurgia de revascularizaçäo miocárdica sem circulaçäo extracorpórea. A idade variou de 13 a 93 anos (63 +/- 12,0 anos), sendo 58 por cento dos pacientes do sexo masculino. A angina foi classificada segundo a Canadian Cardiovascular Society, sendo 6,1 por cento na classe I, 6,8 por cento na classe II, 46,3 por cento na classe III e 40,8 por cento na classe IV. RESULTADOS: A mortalidade intra-operatória foi baixa (0,4 por cento). A mortalidade hospitalar (trinta dias de pós-operatório) foi de 2,58 por cento. A mortalidade e morbidade, no grupo dos pacientes octogenários, foram extremamente baixas em relaçäo aos pacientes operados com circulaçäo extracorpórea (2,2 por cento x 12,6 por cento) (p<0,001). As complicações pós-operatórias que näo resultaram em óbito foram de 7,6 por cento. No último ano, näo observamos diferença entre o número de condutos nos pacientes operados com e sem CEC [com CEC 2,8+/-1,2 e sem CEC 2,8+/-0,8 (NS)]. Infarto agudo do miocárdio foi a complicaçäo näo fatal mais freqüente, observada em 2,8 por cento dos pacientes. O tempo médio de permanência na UTI foi de 22,3 horas. CONCLUSÕES: A RMSCEC, usada como técnica de revascularizaçäo em pacientes multiarteriais, é um procedimento reproduzível e apresenta resultados semelhantes aos obtidos com a operaçäo convencional com CEC. Nesta série foi possível revascularizar o miocárdio sem circulaçäo extracorpórea em mais de 95 por cento dos pacientes, tornando assim, a princípio, todos os pacientes, com indicaçäo de revascularizaçäo miocárdica, potenciais candidatos à operaçäo de RMSCEC.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Adolescent , Adult , Middle Aged , Coronary Disease/surgery , Myocardial Revascularization , Hospital Mortality , Myocardial Infarction , Retrospective Studies
10.
Rev. bras. cir. cardiovasc ; 15(3): 201-211, jul.-set. 2000. graf
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: lil-280497

ABSTRACT

OBJETIVO: Analisar o comportamento hemodinâmico do coraçäo na revascularizaçäo do miocárdio sem a utilizaçäo da circulaçäo extracorpórea, através da cateterizaçäo da artéria pulmonar com cateter de San-Ganz. MATERIAL E METODOS: No peráodo de agosto de 1991 a junho de 1999, foram operados 616 pacientes portadores de angina do peito, que foram submetidos a revascularizaçäo do miocárdio sem a utilizaçäo da circulaçäo extracorpórea. Em 18 pacientes foram estudados os parâmetros hemodinâmicos intra-operatórios. RESULTADOS: A frequência cardíaca manteve-se elevada durante todos os momentos de posicionamento do coraçäo (p=0,0007). O débito cardíaco ao longo do procedimento apresentou variaçäo mínima nos diversos momentos de posicionamento do coraçäo e exposiçäo das artérias coronárias. Entretanto, com o coraçäo na posiçäo normal final, observou-se um aumento importante do débito cardíaco (p=0,010). A pressäo arterial média apresentou-se diminuída em todos os momentos do procedimento de exposiçäo das artérias coronárias (p=0,022). A pressäo arterial pulmonar apresentou-se diminuída durante todos os momentos de mobilizaçäo (NS). A pressäo capilar pulmonar oscilou bastante durante a exposiçäo das coronárias (NS). A pressäo venosa central comportou-se de maneira mais variada durante a exposiçäo das artérias (NS). A resistência vascular sistêmica apresentou-se diminuída durante todo o procedimento (p=0,0001). A resistência vascular pulmonar apresentou-se diminuída em todos os momentos do procedimento (p=0,002). O "stroke volume" apresentou-se inalterado durante a anastomose da interventricular anterior e só se observaram diferenças estatísticas na coronária direita (p=0,002) e artéria circunflexa (p=0,0006) e seus ramos. O índice cardíaco apresentou-se diminuído durante o procedimento (p=0,0011). CONCLUSOES: A) A técnica presente permite a mobilizaçäo máxima do coraçäo sem induçäo de instabilidade hemodinâmica. B) A melhora de alguns parâmetros de hemodinâmica ao final do procedimento pode ser justificada: 1) devido à resposta à revascularizaçäo miocárdica; 2) decorrente da liberaçäo de catecolaminas após a manipulaçäo do coraçäo nas diversas posiçöes; 3) decorrente da liberaçäo de mediadores vasoativos depois da traçäo prolongada do pericírdio


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Heart/physiopathology , Extracorporeal Circulation , Myocardial Revascularization/methods , Aged, 80 and over , Arterial Pressure , Cardiac Output , Cardiac Volume , Heart Rate , Hemodynamics , Intraoperative Period , Vascular Resistance
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL